Pat Toomey For Senate

Pa Right To Bear Arms ( the right of the people to keep and bear arms) Phone 484-266-7353 ©

NEWS FLASH

WELCOME PAGE

illegal-immigrant

profits ahead of the safe

Live Ustream & Chat Lines

Please HelpGrand Ole Opry

Pa Right To Bear Arms

Self Defense News

GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA

Supreme Court tackles gun

Pa Right To Bear Arms BUS

GETTYSBURG 2010

Starbucks

Us And State Reps

Companys That Support Us

Firearms Education

Mayors Against Ill Guns

Guns For Trucking

Guest Book & Tv Show

US & State & Carry Permit

Gun Amao

Firearms Owners Against C

Pat Toomey For Senate

Health Care Bill B/S

Chester Co Friends of Nra

NRA-ILA Grassroots Alert

National Park Service

OpenCarry.org

Pa Open Carry

Limbs For Carla

Campaign for Liberty

Mexico

My Club Links

HOUSE BILLS

Second Amendment Rally

STOLEN GUNS

Schools For Guns

Steve Bryant

ROLLYE JAMES SHOW

Tom Gresham Gun Talk

RECALLS

SOUND OFF ON GUN LAWS

Sonia Sotomayor

Hb s 22

HONOR FLIGHT

House Bail Out Bill

Thank You to veterans

WEB SITE DONATIONS

WANTED PERSONS

Pa Universitys No Guns

US Supreme Court

KILLED In Line Of Duty

Finance Bill IS BULL SHIT

Daily Local Ches Co Pa

Chester Co Pa NEWS

Arizona

Alabama

Alaska

California

Connecticut

Colorado

CHICAGO Il Guns

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Idaho

Indiana

Illinois

Kansas

Kentucky

MaryLand

Maine

Michigan

Missouri

Montana GUN LAWS

Nebraska

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York Guns

North Carolina

OKLAHOMA

Ohio Guns

Pittsburgh Pa

Phila Pa Guns

South Dakota

Tennesse

Texas

UT: State office

Virginia

Vermont

Washtington Dc Guns

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Country Craft

Kennett Twp Save Bridge

Trace Adkins & Faan

Barack Obama & Joe Biden

Snow Storm 2010

Cindi's Sacred Garden

Crow Creek Sioux

Were is my gas going

FAKE CLUB

Pat Toomey For Senate
Toomey for Senate

michael,

Over the years Arlen Specter has been on every possible side of the health care debate in America. Way back in 1994 he trucked two huge blow up charts to the senate floor to block the Clinton plan and just last Saturday he the became the 19th senator to sign an official letter to Sen. Reid urging him push a bill just like the Clintons' 1994 bill through the Senate using reconciliation.
 
It's clear that Arlen Specter is far more interested in preserving his political career than he is in providing sensible reforms that will help Pennsylvania families.
 
Please take a moment to scroll though the timeline below and decide for yourself if Arlen Specter wants what's best for Pennsylvania.

August 8, 1994: Arlen Specter stands up on the floor of the Senate with large blow up charts to demonstrate the kind of bureaucracies President Clinton’s health care plan would create. Specter credits his charts with helping to turn public opinion against the legislation. Click HERE to watch.

March 30, 2009: Specter says on the Senate floor that using reconciliation for health care or other issues would be a “colossal mistake.” Click HERE to read Specter press release.

April 28, 2009: Specter says: “I am opposed to reconciliation to be used for health care or for any other substantive legislative issue.” Click HERE to watch.

May 3, 2009: Specter opposes a public government-run health care plan. Click HERE to watch.

June 25, 2009: Specter comes out in support of a government option on June 25, 2009, saying, “I think Senator Schumer has the right idea about having a public component which has a level playing field with the private sector, but the public component can be included.” Click HERE to watch.

October 8, 2009: Specter signs a letter to Harry Reid urging the inclusion of a public option. Click HERE to read Specter press release.

February 1, 2010: At the Pennsylvania Progressive Forum, Specter comes out in support of passing amendments to the Senate health care bill using reconciliation. He says: "I believe we ought to pass comprehensive health care reform and we ought to do it now and there is a way to do it. I provided the 60th vote. We passed it in the Senate. Let the House accept it, simultaneously with a bill to make certain changes through reconciliation and 50 votes." Click HERE for coverage.

February 20, 2010: Specter becomes the 19th senator to sign an official letter to Harry Reid urging him to push the public option through the Senate using reconciliation. Click HERE for coverage.
 
We need a principled leader representing us in the Senate, not a career opportunist. Help us elect Pat this November by making a contribution to our campaign, signing up to volunteer or even by forwarding each email you recieve from our campaign to 10 of your friends.

Thank you very much for your continued hard work and support,
Mark
 
Mark Harris
Campaign Manager, Toomey for Senate
 
 

 
 

 

Paid for by Toomey for Senate



White House Accused of Federal Crime in Specter, Bennet Races

By Jeffrey Lord on 2.22.10 @ 6:09AM

"Whoever solicits or receives … any….thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." -- 18 USC Sec. 211 -- Bribery, Graft and Conflicts of Interest: Acceptance or solicitation to obtain appointive public office

 "In the face of a White House denial, U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak stuck to his story yesterday that the Obama administration offered him a "high-ranking" government post if he would not run against U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania's Democratic primary."
-- Philadelphia Inquirer
February 19, 2010

"D.C. job alleged as attempt to deter Romanoff"
--
Denver Post
September 27, 2009



A bombshell has just exploded in the 2010 elections.

For the second time in five months, the Obama White House is being accused -- by Democrats -- of offering high ranking government jobs in return for political favors. What no one is reporting is that this is a violation of federal law that can lead to prison time, a fine or both, according to Title 18, Chapter 11, Section 211 of the United States Code.

The jobs in question? Secretary of the Navy and a position within the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The favor requested in return? Withdrawal from Senate challenges to two sitting United States Senators, both Democrats supported by President Obama. The Senators are Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania and Michael Bennet in Colorado.

On Friday, Pennsylvania Congressman Joe Sestak, the Democrat challenging Specter for re-nomination, launched the controversy by accusing the Obama White House of offering him a federal job in exchange for his agreeing to abandon his race against Specter.

In August of 2009, the Denver Post reported last September, Deputy White House Chief of Staff Jim Messina "offered specific suggestions" for a job in the Obama Administration to Colorado Democrat Andrew Romanoff, a former state House Speaker, if Romanoff would agree to abandon a nomination challenge to U.S. Senator Michael Bennet. Bennet was appointed to the seat upon the resignation of then-Senator Ken Salazar after Salazar was appointed by Obama to serve as Secretary of the Interior. According to the Post, the specific job mentioned was in the U.S. Agency for International Development. The Post cited "several sources who described the communication to The Denver Post."

The paper also describes Messina as "President Barack Obama's deputy chief of staff and a storied fixer in the White House political shop." Messina's immediate boss is White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel.

Sestak is standing by his story. Romanoff refused to discuss it with the Denver paper. In both instances the White House has denied the offers took place. The Sestak story in the Philadelphia Inquirer, reported by Thomas Fitzgerald, can be found here, While the Denver Post story, reported by Michael Riley, from September 27, 2009, can be read here.

In an interview with Philadelphia television anchor Larry Kane, who broke the story on Larry Kane: Voice of Reason, a Comcast Network show, Sestak says someone -- unnamed -- in the Obama White House offered him a federal job if he would quit the Senate race against Specter, the latter having the support of President Obama, Vice President Biden and, in the state itself, outgoing Democratic Governor Ed Rendell. Both Biden and Rendell are longtime friends of Specter, with Biden taking personal credit for convincing Specter to leave the Republican Party and switch to the Democrats. Rendell served as a deputy to Specter when the future senator's career began as Philadelphia's District Attorney, a job Rendell himself would eventually hold.

Asked Kane of Sestak in the Comcast interview:

"Is it true that you were offered a high ranking job in the administration in a bid to get you to drop out of the primary against Arlen Specter?"

"Yes" replied Sestak.

Kane: "Was it Secretary of the Navy?"

To which the Congressman replied:

"No comment."

Sestak is a retired Navy admiral.

In the Colorado case, the Post reported that while Romanoff refused comment on a withdrawal-for-a-job offer, "several top Colorado Democrats described Messina's outreach to Romanoff to The Post, including the discussion of specific jobs in the administration. They asked for anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject."

The Post also noted that the day after Romanoff announced his Senate candidacy, President Obama quickly announced his endorsement of Senator Bennet.

The discovery that the White House has now been reported on two separate occasions in two different states to be deliberately committing a potential violation of federal law -- in order to preserve the Democrats' Senate majority -- could prove explosive in this highly political year. The 60-seat majority slipped to 59 seats with the death of Senator Edward Kennedy, a Democrat, and the election of Republican Senator Scott Brown. Many political analysts are suggesting Democrats could lose enough seats to lose their majority altogether.

This is the stuff of congressional investigations and cable news alerts, as an array of questions will inevitably start being asked of the Obama White House.

Here are but a few lines of inquiry, some inevitably straight out of Watergate.

* Who in the White House had this conversation with Congressman Sestak?

* Did Deputy Chief of Staff Messina have the same conversation with Sestak he is alleged to have had with Romanoff -- and has he or anyone else on the White House staff had similar conversations with other candidates that promise federal jobs for political favors?

* They keep logs of these calls. How quickly will they be produced?

* How quickly would e-mails between the White House, Sestak, Specter, Romanoff and Bennet be produced?

* Secretary of the Navy is an important job. Did this job offer or the reported offer of the US AID position to Romanoff have the approval of President Obama or Vice President Biden?

* What did the President know and when did he know it?

* What did the Vice President know and when did he know it? (Note: Vice President Biden, in this tale, is Specter's longtime friend who takes credit for luring Specter to switch parties. Can it really be that an offer of Secretary of the Navy to get Sestak out of Specter's race would not be known and or approved by the Vice President? Does Messina or some other White House staffer -- like Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel -- have that authority?)

* What did White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel know, and when did he know it?

* What did Congressman Sestak know and when did he know it? Was he aware that the offer of a federal job in return for a political favor -- his withdrawal from the Senate race -- could open the White House to a criminal investigation?

* What did Senator Specter know about any of this and when did he know it? .

* What did Governor Rendell, who, as the titular leader of Pennsylvania Democrats, is throwing his political weight and machine to his old friend Specter, know about this? And when did he know it?

* Will the Department of Justice be looking into these two separate news stories, one supplied by a sitting United States Congressman, that paint a clear picture of jobs for political favors?

* Will Attorney General Holder recuse himself from such an investigation?

While in recent years there have been bribery scandals that centered on the exchange of favors for a business deal (Democrat William Jefferson, a Louisiana Congressman) or cash for earmarks (Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham), the idea of violating federal law by offering a federal job in return for a political favor (leaving two hotly contested Senate races in this instance) is not new.

Let's go back in history for a moment.

It's the spring of 1960, in the middle of a bitter fight for the Democratic presidential nomination between then Senators John F. Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, Lyndon Johnson, Stuart Symington and the 1952 and 1956 nominee, ex-Illinois Governor Adlai Stevenson.

Covering the campaign for what would become the grandfather of all political campaign books was journalist and JFK friend Theodore H. White. In his book, the Pulitzer Prize-winning The Making of the President 1960, published in 1961, White tells the story of a plane flight with JFK on the candidate's private plane The Caroline. The nomination fight is going on at a furious pace, and White and Kennedy are having another of their innumerable private chats for White's book while the plane brings JFK back from a campaign swing where he spoke to delegates in Montana. 

The subject? Let's let White tell the story.

The conversation began in a burst of anger. A story had appeared in a New York newspaper that evening that an Eastern Governor had claimed that Kennedy had offered him a cabinet post in return for his Convention support. His anger was cold, furious. When Kennedy is angry, he is at his most precise, almost schoolmasterish. It is a federal offense, he said, to offer any man a federal job in return for a favor. This was an accusation of a federal offense. It was not so.

Let's focus on that JFK line again:

"It is a federal offense, he said, to offer any man a federal job in return for a favor."

With a fine and jail time attached if convicted.

What Larry Kane discovered with the response of Congressman Sestak -- and Sestak is sticking to his story -- combined with what the Denver Post has previously reported in the Romanoff case -- appears to be a series of connecting dots.

A connecting of dots -- by Democrats -- that leads from Colorado to Pennsylvania straight into the West Wing of the White House.

And possibly the jail house.

"It is a federal offense," said John F. Kennedy, "to offer any man a federal job in return for a favor."

And so it is.

Jeffrey Lord is a former Reagan White House political director and author.


Sestak calls for new ban on assault weapons

Sunday, August 9, 2009

By ALEX ROSE
arose@delcotimes.com

Two days after announcing his candidacy for the U.S. Senate, U.S. Rep. Joseph Sestak, D-7, of Edgmont, urged his colleagues in the Legislature to reinstate an assault weapons ban that expired in 2004.

In a release Thursday, Sestak pointed to an Aug. 4 shooting in Allegheny County, where George Sodini, 48, of Scott Township, used two 9 mm semi-automatics and a .45-caliber revolver to kill three women and wound nine others in an aerobics class before taking his own life.

“As we continue to see the effects of the violence in our state and nation, we must enact legislation banning assault weapons with the necessary sense of urgency,” said Sestak. “The senseless shootings of so many innocent victims during an aerobics class in Allegheny County, and of the three police officers in Pittsburgh this past April, are heartbreaking reminders that we must immediately address the loss of the common-sense ban earlier this decade.”

Police investigating the Collier Township shooting said Sodini bought his weapons legally from TGSCOM Inc., of Green Bay, Wis., the same dealer who sold a 22-caliber handgun to Virginia Tech shooter Seung-Hui Cho.

Typically, gun control is seen as a radioactive issue during statewide elections in Pennsylvania, which has a large contingent of hunters and gun owners on both sides of the aisle.

Sestak said he is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and believes in an individual’s right to bear arms, but statistics following the 1994 implementation of the first assault weapons ban showed drastic reductions in police officer murders from assault weapons and an overall drop in such weapons being traced to a crime.

“With regard to politics, I believe that what is most needed and valued by Pennsylvanians in their future leaders in Washington D.C., is placing principle above politics,” said Sestak. “I believe this is the right thing to do for the safety of our citizens, particularly law enforcement officers, while protecting legal citizens’ rights for protecting their homes, and for hunting and other recreational purposes.”

Sestak is therefore reviving a bill that died in committee last session, which he and 67 other House Democrats had co-sponsored.

That bill would revise the definition of a “semi-automatic assault weapon” to include any semiautomatic rifle or pistol that has specific characteristics, such as a telescoping stock, and can accept a detachable magazine.

The bill also would prohibit the importation of any such weapon; “conversion kits” to turn weapons into semi-automatics; and the transfer of any assault weapon with a large-capacity ammunition-feeding device.

Semi-automatic shotguns, pistols and rifles like the AK-47, the SKS, the UZI and the Bushmaster XM15 would fall under the ban, according to the release.

Incumbent U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter, D-Pa., Sestak’s opponent in the 2010 Senatorial primary election, said a hearing on the merits of such legislation should be held prior to any legislative action.

Specter pointed to studies performed by the Department of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control, which have brought into question the effectiveness of banning assault weapons, and said in his experience as the former District Attorney of Philadelphia that long jail terms were traditionally the best way to deal with gun violence.

“The study commissioned by DOJ found that although there was a decline in gun crimes involving assault weapons during the ban, a renewal of the ban would have a small effect on gun violence, perhaps too small for reliable measurement since assault weapons are rarely used in gun crimes,” said Specter.

Former U.S. Rep. Pat Toomey, a Republican Senatorial candidate, also weighed in on Sestak’s call to reinstate the ban.

“Whenever there’s an outrageous criminal use of guns, liberals like Joe Sestak always try to penalize law-abiding gun-owners rather than holding the criminals responsible,” said Toomey in a statement. “Sestak is wrong. We should punish criminals and protect gun ownership rights.”

“As someone who served in the military for 31 years, I’ve spent most of my life around weapons,” said Sestak, a retired Navy vice admiral. “I support the legitimate right to bear arms and respect the many, many responsible gun owners of our state and the nation. However, there are those who are committing egregious acts of violence and their reprehensible actions on innocent victims and brave law enforcement officers must be stopped.”
Pat Toomy for Senate
Dear Team Toomey Member,

Another week has passed and momentum for Pat's candidacy continues to surge. Contributions are rolling in from across the country and residents from every county in the Commonwealth are signing on as volunteers for Pat's campaign.

Last Thursday, following weeks of speculation, former PA Governor, Tom Ridge, decided against running in next year's Senate primary. In a statement, Pat reinforced the former governor's message to stand by the principles of limited government, less taxes, competent governance and shared responsibility.

These are the principles that Pat relays everyday as he travels the Commonwealth and connects with its residents. For a look at Pat on the road, check out the Monroe County coverage from last week, as well as his chat with Jon Delano at KDKA in Pittsburgh, and his interview with WITF public radio in Harrisburg. Pat is confident that delivering the messages behind these shared principles will not only unite the Republican Party, but more importantly, unite the majority of our fellow citizens - regardless of their party affiliation.

As Pat grinds it out on the road and connects with voters, his newly minted Democratic opponent, Arlen Specter, continues his charade as a Democrat and cozies up with the Party's brethren at events like last evening's swanky Philadelphia Democratic City Committee's spring dinner. You can also read about Specter's most recent political maneuvers here and here.

Last week also presented some new polling information that positions Pat incredibly well against Arlen Specter in a general election contest – despite Pat's low name recognition. Two such polls show Pat within single-digit margins of the 30 year incumbent Senator Specter in a general election.

This should come as no surprise because Pat's former Democrat-leaning Congressional District is an excellent indicator of his ability to win Democrat and Republican votes. Without a doubt Pat Toomey is the candidate who can unite Republicans and defeat the Democratic nominee in the general election.

Thank you for your continued and unwavering support of Pat's campaign for U.S. Senate. Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. That's how it almost always happens.

Sincerely
Mark Harris
Toomey for Senate



Time For Arlen Specter To Go
-- GOA Supports Pro-gunner Pat Toomey

Gun Owners of America Political Victory Fund E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Pl Suite 102
Springfield VA 22151
(703) 321-8585
http://www.goapvf.org

Wednesday, April 29, 2009


First, Senator Arlen Specter provided the instrumental Republican
support to get anti-gun Attorney General Eric Holder confirmed by the
Senate.

Then, he singlehandedly pushed through the massive economic bailout, the
so-called stimulus bill, which contained several provisions of concern
to gun owners.

So it comes as no surprise that liberal anti-gun Specter, who has no
loyalty to the Constitution, also has no loyalty to the political party
that elected him.  Specter announced this week that he will leave the
Republican Party and run as a Democrat in 2010.

Specter's announcement comes only after poll after poll showed him
trailing pro-gun conservative Pat Toomey in a Republican primary.

Specter thinks that changing parties will improve his chances of winning
next year.

What he's going to learn is that the voters of Pennsylvania are much
more concerned about their Constitutional rights than they are with what
political party a candidate belongs to.

Every time Attorney General Eric Holder opens his mouth and talks about
reinstating the Clinton gun ban, gun owners know they have Arlen Specter
to thank.

Back in early January, Sen. Specter said he had "grave concerns" about
Eric Holder.  He made it sound like he was going to join other pro-gun
Senators and oppose the Holder nomination.

Specter was only putting on a show.

After pretending to oppose Eric Holder, Sen. Specter provided the key
support that brought the nomination to the floor of the Senate.

Why the big switch?

Simple.  When it looked like Specter was going to face a primary
challenge from a real conservative, he talked tough and made it look
like he was opposed to Holder.  Then for a while, it appeared that
Specter would not have a serious challenge, so Specter flip-flopped and
decided not to oppose Holder.

With people like Specter in office, it's no wonder our gun rights are in
such jeopardy.

At least gun owners have a clear choice in the next election.  Former
Congressman Pat Toomey has again taken up the conservative, pro-gun
mantle and will challenge the liberal incumbent.

Visit http://www.toomeyforsenate.com/contribute to support Pat Toomey
for Senate.

Together, we can defeat the Senate's most dangerous turncoat and replace
him with a real Second Amendment defender.

Specter was one of three Republicans whose vote was needed to pass the
bailout.  When one of the other two Senators expressed reservations,
good old Arlen Specter stepped in and brought that Senator "back in
line."

Without Specter, there would be no $1 TRILLION bailout.

Really, by the time debt services and other frills of the "socialism
bill" are accounted for, the cost will be over $3 TRILLION!

The debt foisted upon us by Arlen Specter will be passed on to
succeeding generations, AND the bailout is being used as a tool of the
anti-gun left.

You see, the bailout bill contains provisions that can fund anti-gun
activist organizations like ACORN and Moveon.org to the tune of hundreds
of millions -- even billions -- of your taxpayer dollars.

The bailout also contains provisions to require your doctor to
retroactively put your confidential medical records in a government
database.  Medical records have already been used to deny about 200,000
military veterans their Second Amendment rights, and that situation will
be made worse for all citizens thanks to the Specter bailout bill.

Perhaps no single Senator is negatively affecting the future of this
country more than Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter.

Please help Gun Owners of America make this Specter's last term in
office by supporting Pat Toomey for Senate at:
http://www.toomeyforsenate.com/contribute

Rep. Toomey challenged Specter in a primary in 2004 with the support of
Gun Owners of America, and came just 1.7% short of winning.

Specter's bacon was pulled out of the fire only after the incumbent
Senator, President Bush and even, unfortunately, some in the gun rights
community campaigned on his behalf at the last minute.

Well, Senator Specter has sold out the people of Pennsylvania and
conservatives across the nation for the last time.

At the same time we get rid of an enemy of gun rights, we can also help
to elect an ardent supporter of the Second Amendment.

Pat Toomey served in the U.S. House of Representatives for three terms,
before honoring a self-imposed term limit and retiring in 2004.

Rep. Toomey was "A" rated by Gun Owners of America during his time in
Congress.  Even though he was supposedly "too conservative" for the
eastern Pennsylvania district he represented, Toomey stood firm on his
pro-Second Amendment principles.

Unlike Arlen Specter, there was no waffling on the issues concerning
your gun rights.

Gun Owners of America knows from experience that when we're in the
trenches battling the anti-gunners over reinstating the semi-auto gun
ban, closing down gun shows and funding liberal leftist organizations,
Pat Toomey will be with us shoulder to shoulder.

But first he has to defeat Specter, an anti-gun
Republican-turned-Democrat with millions of dollars in the bank and lots
of new liberal friends ready to give him more.

Gun Owners of America calls on sportsmen and gun owners in Pennsylvania
and across the country to stand with us to defeat Arlen Specter and to
elect Pat Toomey to the U.S. Senate.

Please make the most generous contribution possible to Pat Toomey for
Senate at http://www.toomeyforsenate.com/contribute on the web.

If you prefer to contribute by check, make your check payable to "Toomey
for Senate" and mail to: PO Box 220, Orefield, PA 18069.

Or, you can call the campaign at 484-809-7994 to contribute by phone.

Pat Toomey stands 100% in favor of your gun rights.  Together, let's
stand with Pat Toomey in this crucial election.

Sincerely,

Tim Macy
Vice Chairman


Pat Toomey's Biography

Pat Toomey is a Pennsylvania Republican running for the U.S. Senate.

Growing up the third of six children in a blue-collar working class family - his father a union worker and his mother a part-time secretary at their parish church – Pat Toomey was taught the values of hard-work and self-reliance. Through part-time jobs and scholarships Pat earned a degree from Harvard University.

As a former three-term member of the U.S. House of Representatives, Pat Toomey won hard-fought elections in a Democrat-leaning district that hasn’t voted for a Republican Presidential candidate in over 20 years. In Congress, Pat distinguished himself as a national advocate for limited government, lower taxes and personal freedom. His dedication to these beliefs earned him recognition from the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste, Americans for Tax Reform, the National Taxpayers’ Union and the US Chamber of Commerce.

Since leaving Congress, Pat Toomey has continued his work for these important principles as President of the Club for Growth, a leading nationwide grassroots organization dedicated to growing the economy through free enterprise, lower taxes and less wasteful spending.

Prior to his public service, Pat’s first career was in investment banking, where he arranged interest rate and currency swaps for corporate clients, enabling them to lower their borrowing costs and create more American jobs. This experience gave Pat a keen understanding of the workings of the international capital markets. As a former successful restaurateur and small business owner, Pat understands that small businesses thrive and create jobs when freed from the yoke of onerous taxes and burdensome regulations.

Pat lives in Zionsville, PA with his wife Kris and their two children.



*** KEEP OUR RIGHTS ALIVE AND GOING ***
Cell 484-266-7353 & Office 610-268-7007
FAX 1-888-897-1827
righttobeararms@parighttobeararms.com

Website powered by Network Solutions®